One often seeks for 'meaning' in myriads of things,
small and big, 'signifcant' and 'trivial' (these two words
also being related to the term, 'meaning').
There are questions, discussions, and even heated debate
over the "Purpose of Life" (as so deviously exploited by a
certain religious figure with some serious financial rewards,
whether intentional or not, and regardless of how he utilized
all that profit), in our hopeless effort to "FIND" some "meaning"
in what we call our lives.
Such quest for meaning in one's life already implies that one
regards the self as deserving of that attention, worthy of the
very thing he or she seeks, i.e. "meaning."
During a recent conversation with my colleague and friend,
which we usually have in a surprsingly casual manner
(surprising because we draw some insightful conclusions,
like finding a gem in the mud, or to be more appropriate -
ash tray), I found myself saying something like the following.
"People always seek for meaning in everything, as if it is
some tangible, self-standing absolute. But we often forget
how meaning is something you "give" to something else
otherwise, well, 'meaning-less'. Meaning itself comes into
'being' when you assign it to an idea, object, people, and
of course, the never-ending subject of the whole discussion
on meaning- one self."
My friend then quoted the well-known sage regent:
"Yeah, even Solomon, the wisest man, said "Meaningless,
meaningless, everything is meaningless. SHIT, it's fucking
all meaningless!"
And I agree. Everything, any thing, those that may exist
without a particular value given to it, is in fact, meaningless.
More abstract "bodies" only find more substantial existence
in "meaning" it self, in its being assigned the particular value
which we call, or at least I address for the purpose of this
bit as "meaning." The idea of "meaning" itself, for instance.
Even yet, the word "meaning" still can exist on its own
as a juxtaposition of alphabets which, well, "mean" nothing
more than curves and vertical lines to someone illiterate,
I suppose.
Every being, object, or invention (whether physical or
abstract) are rather like a vessel which require the contents
to reach its "true", or "full" value. These e-pressions I
am attempting employ turn out to be quite self-explanatory and
obvious, so much so that this babble almost appears
strained and well, "meaningless." To get back to my original
train of thought, let's consider the word, "meaningful", and
"meaningless": quite clearly, assuming that we haven't
realized this obvious, self-explanatory fact already, the words
point to the fact that meaning is something bestowed upon
another. So to be blatantly obvious, things are meaningless
without the meaning given to it. Ergo, everything, in its
natural, still form, is meaningless.
But is it so depressing? Was Solomon just going through
that nervous breakdown every genius seem to go through
before he cuts off his ear or does him self in with a pistol,
drugs, or, I suppose in Solomon's case, the alleged
debauchery accompanied by his idolatery (and a harem
to compare, which leads me to question whether he was
really the wisest man, or just the bad-ass-est P-I-M-P).
No, I do not think so, for one. As mentioned before,
things are meaningless in their natural state as, well,
they are not given the meaning. All we need to do is
bestow meaning on it so it becomes meaning-full. Like filling
an empty glass with milk, wine, or beer. Like a knife,
as my friend pointed out, and how many people use as
an example, although that metaphor does not serve best
in me pointing out (no pun intended) the composition of the
word revealing its true nature.
So this circles back to the premise mentioned quite earlier
on in this barrage of words. Meaning it self, as people
often say they are trying to "find", is not a self-standing,
objective "being (for the lack of a better term without
being redundant and obvious... by using any e-pression
related to, well, "meaning" itself). Rather, it is something
created and that creates, "meaning" in a "meaningless"
object, idea, relationship or whatever it may be, in turn making
it "meaningful". The very process of bestowing a value,
or to be more precise (and yet again, self-explanatory and
redundantly obvious), meaning is created by giving meaning
to something for which many people seem to look for: an
effort to "FIND" meaning, rather than so simply bringing
in to existence what they so longed to discover.
Of course, it may seem like I'm being an ignorant ass
just arguing over symantics and the word usage of "finding
the meaning." Perhaps so, especially considering the
e-pression translate quite literally in Korean, though my
knowledge of other languages are not sufficient to make
the same case for those as well.
My intention behind this lengthy prose, however, is to give
the readers, and myself, some hope in the fact that
meaning (a close relative of concepts such as purpose,
fate, love, faith, and other ideas or beliefs that seem oh so
elusive to the despaired) is not a fleeting butterfly often
out of our reach, but something over which we have command,
just like breathing, eating, or even shitting. Hell, we have
even less command over shitting than our powerful ability
to create meaning.
And in this vein, I'd like to point out that "finding" meaning is
not a process of discovering something that may possible
remain undiscovered, but rather like arranging the elements
of the complete product that already exist in one's mind.
The pieces are always available: you just have to find your
way to putting them together, and often it appears to be a
daunting task, as it may well be, although I previously did
make it sound so simple and easy.
But you know what the beautiful part is? If you fuck up a LEGO
structure, you can always redesign and rebuild it as you learn
better ways to do so. Meaning too, is fluid and malleable, that
you always have the opportunity do refine or completely
redesign something that requires such reconsideration.
Of course, realistically, the task is not always that simple,
as the ramifications already incurred may be severe,
and the fear of such consequences prevent many of us
getting started on the blue print.
I'm generally not an optimistic guy, but I would like to propose
the following. If anything, you can always go at it
brick-by-brick. And I'll leave it at that for today.